Acclaimed Church of England high school selects pupils on basis of parents’ cleaning, flower arranging and participation in ‘tea and coffee rota’

The Fair Admissions Campaign is today revealing some of the most unrepresentative schools in the country on the basis of the proportion of intake that speaks English as an additional language – including one school, Twyford Church of England High School, that gives priority in its admissions to pupils whose parents participate in ‘voluntary service’ such as ‘Bell ringing’, ‘Flower arranging at church’, ‘Assisting with collection/counting money’, ‘Tea & coffee Rota’, ‘Church cleaning’ and ‘Church maintenance’.

In 2011, Michael Gove visited the school where he called it ‘a superb state school which draws children from every social background and gives them all a rigorous academic education’. Then in July, Mr Gove gave a speech to the Church of England in which he praised the head for the inclusive approach to the issue of school admissions at a new Free School which she was involved in setting up. But Twyford itself is in fact extremely selective. The school allocates 150 of its 180 places to Christians, awarding them points for meeting the aforementioned criteria, along with others such as ‘Parish Magazine Editor’ and ‘Technical support’. Similarly, children are awarded points for taking part in ‘Choir / Music Group’s associated with the Church, and for ‘Church based outreach’. The remaining 30 places are allocated to parents and children of other faiths who take part in similar activities, such as ‘Cleaning place of worship’, ‘Serving refreshments at place of worship’ and ‘Preparing food at place of worship’.

At Twyford 10% of pupils are eligible for Free School Meals, compared with 24% of the public living in its local area (known as a middle super output area), 26% across pupils at schools sharing the same first half of post code and 27% across its borough. 10% of pupils speak English as an additional language (EAL), compared to 20% of the public in its MSOA, 39% of pupils across the post code, 50% across the borough and 47% across all neighbouring boroughs.

This makes the school the ninth most unrepresentative school in the country, based on comparing the number of pupils speaking EAL to their local areas. The most unrepresentative school is The King David High School in Manchester, a Jewish school which has admissions criteria to select 100% of pupils on religious grounds. 26% of local pupils speak EAL, compared to 1% in the school.

The second worst is The King’s (the Cathedral) School in Peterborough, a Church of England school which has admissions criteria to select 89% of pupils on the basis of faith. It requires five years of worship but doesn’t objectively set out how this is assessed – a potential breach of the Admissions Code. The school also selects 12 places on general academic ability, despite not being a grammar school. 31% of local pupils speak EAL, compared to 7% in the school.

The fifth worst is the JFS, which has admissions criteria to be 100% selective, and is the Jewish school that had a famous court battle over its religious admissions criteria in 2009, as a result of which it was found to be discriminated on grounds of race. It gives priority to those attending Jewish primaries without naming them and to those doing Jewish charitable work, both likely breaches of the School Admissions Code. 22% of local pupils speak EAL, compared to 9% in the school.

The eighth worst is Finchley Catholic High School, which has admissions criteria to be 100% selective, Catholic school in Barnet. It gets both parents to fill in a very subjective self-assessment form for the priest, who then decides whether this is adequate to provide a reference to the school with no objective criteria for this coming into play – likely to be a breach of the School Admissions Code. 17% of local pupils speak EAL, compared to 7% in the school.

In total, 24 of the worst 100 secondary schools, or 27 of the worst 100 non-grammar schools, are religiously selective – compared to just 16% of all secondaries.

Rabbi Dr Jonathan Romain MBE, Chair of the Accord Coalition, commented, ‘How sad that faith schools – once a beacon of hope for the poor and vulnerable – are often so socially and economically selective that they have become the bastion of the privileged. It is not just an educational mismatch but a religious failure too. Most Church schools were set up to provide education for the poorest, so skimming off many of those children with the sharpest elbowed and most affluent parents in a local community is in conflict with the original mission of the Church’s involvement in school age education. It is time that Twyford High School took inspiration from those faith schools that are choosing to turn away from religiously discriminatory admissions and became a beacon of inclusivity, rather than privilege.’

Professor Ted Cantle, founder of the Institute of Community Cohesion and author of the Cantle Report into the 2001 race riots, commented, ‘Religious selection directly contributes to ethnic segregation – a problem which both local and national studies have shown to be growing over the last 10 years. The advent of academies, responsible for their own admissions, and the new free schools, are accelerating segregation and failing to provide our children with the opportunity to dispel the fear and prejudice which it breeds.’

The British Humanist Association, a founding member of the Fair Admissions Campaign, recently won a case at the Schools Adjudicator about the London Oratory School, because the school similarly selects on the basis of parents’ flower arranging. The school removed cleaning from its admissions arrangements after the Office of the Schools Adjudicator ruled last year that this breached the school admissions code.  BHA Head of Public Affairs Pavan Dhaliwal commented, ‘Any right minded person would deplore these schools and the egregious system which allows for it to select pupils on the basis of their parents’ flower arranging, collecting money from the pews, maintaining or cleaning the church or serving tea and coffee. Such blatant discrimination within the faith schools regime allows them to socio-economically determine their intake. The vast majority of the public do not think it is right for a child to be turned away from their local school, or the best school in their area, because they are of no religion or of the wrong religion. The Secretary of State should be challenging, not endorsing, such a socially divisive system.’

The Richmond Inclusive Schools Campaign recently fought against the establishment of a highly exclusive Catholic secondary school. Their spokesperson, Jeremy Rodell, said ‘We have local examples of community primary schools with more than five times the proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals compared to church schools just a short distance away. We also have a new Church of England primary with no faith-based selection at all. State-funded church schools can choose whether they want to serve the whole community, or turn local children away simply because of their parents’ religious practices.’


For further comment please contact BHA Head of Public Affairs Pavan Dhaliwal on 07738 435 059 or Accord Coalition Chair Jonathan Romain on 07770 722 893 or email

Read Twyford School’s admissions policy:

The Church of England’s London Diocesan Board for Schools recently told the Campaign that its ‘…policy is to encourage our Church of England Schools to have half open places and half foundation places. For the new schools we are promoting we are going for all open places’.

Visit the Fair Admissions Campaign’s website:

The Fair Admissions Campaign wants all state-funded schools in England and Wales to be open equally to all children, without regard to religion or belief. The Campaign is supported by a wide coalition of individuals and national and local organisations. We hold diverse views on whether or not the state should fund faith schools. But we all believe that faith-based discrimination in access to schools that are funded by the taxpayer is wrong in principle and a cause of religious, ethnic, and socio-economic segregation, all of which are harmful to community cohesion. It is time it stopped.

Supporters of the campaign include the Accord Coalition, the British Humanist Association, Professor Ted Cantle and the iCoCo Foundation, the Association of Teachers and LecturersBritish Muslims for Secular Democracy, the Campaign for State Education, the Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education, the Christian think tank Ekklesia, the Hindu Academy, the Green Party, the Liberal Democrat Education AssociationLiberal Youth, the Local Schools NetworkRichmond Inclusive Schools Campaign, the Runnymede Trust, the Socialist Educational Association, and the General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches.